MARC details
000 -LEADER |
fixed length control field |
02490nam a22003133a 4500 |
001 - CONTROL NUMBER |
control field |
UPMIN-00005727660 |
003 - CONTROL NUMBER IDENTIFIER |
control field |
UPMIN |
005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION |
control field |
20221128174147.0 |
008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION |
fixed length control field |
221128b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d |
040 ## - CATALOGING SOURCE |
Original cataloging agency |
DLC |
Transcribing agency |
UPMin |
Modifying agency |
upmin |
041 ## - LANGUAGE CODE |
Language code of text/sound track or separate title |
eng |
090 #0 - LOCALLY ASSIGNED LC-TYPE CALL NUMBER (OCLC); LOCAL CALL NUMBER (RLIN) |
Classification number (OCLC) (R) ; Classification number, CALL (RLIN) (NR) |
LG 993.5 2011 |
Local cutter number (OCLC) ; Book number/undivided call number, CALL (RLIN) |
A64 B66 |
100 ## - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME |
Personal name |
Bontia, Champ Ragde A. |
245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT |
Title |
Diversity index-based measure of commonness : |
Remainder of title |
bridging the gap between diversity and commonness / |
Statement of responsibility, etc. |
Champ Ragde A. Bontia. |
260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. |
Date of publication, distribution, etc. |
2011 |
300 ## - PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION |
Extent |
91 leaves. |
500 ## - GENERAL NOTE |
General note |
Thesis (BS Applied Mathematics) -- University of the Philippines Mindanao, 2011 |
520 3# - SUMMARY, ETC. |
Summary, etc. |
This study evaluates an existing index of commonness, the kf-score method, and reformulate it with respect to the gaps that it exhibited. The reformulation commonness index was based on the reverse method of measuring diversity. The performance of the reformulated commonness index was compared to the results of the kf-score method, the method that it was derived from, and the Gini-Simpson diversity index, the index that it was based on. The comparison was done by comparing the results of the 3 methods using descriptive statistics and by Kruskal-Wallis non-parametric comparison test. The results of the reformulated commonness index was seen to be better than the results of the 2 other methods. When compared statistically by Kruskal-Wallis non-parametric comparison test, one or more of the methods were proven to have significantly different result. Therefore, the methods were further compared using the Dunn's post-test, the formulated commonness index and the kf-score method were proven to be statistically different.. However, the formulated commonness index and the Gin-Simpson diversity index resulted to have no significant difference at all. Therefore, it was concluded that both methods, the formulated index and the Gini-Simpson diversity index, can be good measures of commonness, though the formulated commonness index generates a more elegant set commonness scores. This is because the formulated commonness index gives results that are more or less distinct from other commonness scores. |
650 17 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM |
Topical term or geographic name entry element |
Commonness index. |
650 17 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM |
Topical term or geographic name entry element |
kf-score. |
650 17 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM |
Topical term or geographic name entry element |
Diversity indices. |
650 17 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM |
Topical term or geographic name entry element |
Gini-Simpson diversity index. |
650 17 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM |
Topical term or geographic name entry element |
Kruscall-Wallis on-parametric comparison test. |
650 17 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM |
Topical term or geographic name entry element |
Dunn's post-test. |
658 ## - INDEX TERM--CURRICULUM OBJECTIVE |
Main curriculum objective |
Undergraduate Thesis |
Curriculum code |
AMAT200 |
905 ## - LOCAL DATA ELEMENT E, LDE (RLIN) |
a |
Fi |
905 ## - LOCAL DATA ELEMENT E, LDE (RLIN) |
a |
UP |
942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA) |
Source of classification or shelving scheme |
Library of Congress Classification |
Koha item type |
Thesis |