| 000 | 01243nam a2200241 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | UPMIN-00000009130 | ||
| 003 | UPMIN | ||
| 005 | 20230210162646.0 | ||
| 008 | 230210b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 040 |
_aDLC _cUPMin _dupmin |
||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 090 |
_aLG993.5 2002 _bA64 S49 |
||
| 100 | 1 |
_aSevilla, Peter Paul P. _92377 |
|
| 245 | 0 | 0 |
_aOn different end-point constraints of cubic spline interpolation / _cPeter Paul P. Sevilla |
| 260 | _c2002 | ||
| 300 | _a59 leaves | ||
| 502 | _aThesis (BS Applied Mathematics) -- University of the Philippines Mindanao, 2002 | ||
| 520 | 3 | _aThis study made use of four cubic spline interpolation methods with four different conditions to approximate six different test functions coming from different families of functions. The primary goal of the study was to investigate and determine which of the endpoint constraints works best for the six functions. The numerical experiment showed that natural, periodic and not-a-knot boundary conditions were the best interpolants for most of the test functions. However, no definite boundary condition could give a uniformly best result. | |
| 658 |
_aUndergraduate Thesis _cAMAT200, _2BSAM |
||
| 905 | _aFi | ||
| 905 | _aUP | ||
| 942 |
_2lcc _cTHESIS |
||
| 999 |
_c204 _d204 |
||