000 | 02546nam a22002533a 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | UPMIN-00004514055 | ||
003 | UPMIN | ||
005 | 20230613173320.0 | ||
008 | 230613b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
040 |
_aupmin _cUPMin |
||
041 | _aeng | ||
090 | 0 |
_aLG993.5 2008 A7 _bM45 |
|
100 |
_aMenorias, Emily S. _eauthor _917074 |
||
245 |
_aImpacts of beachfront property barriers to the community along the Samal coastline / _cEmily S. Menorias |
||
260 | _c2008 | ||
300 | _a99 leaves | ||
502 | _aThesis (BS Architecture) -- University of the Philippines Mindanao, 2008 | ||
520 | 3 | _aPeople like beaches: their desire for property along this sensitive fringe of land is great. In their efforts to maintain their homes and their beaches, people change beaches, and one way in which they do is by considering seawalls and other structures such as property barriers. Public conflicts arise, especially relating to access to beaches, as more and more of the coastal lands are being taken up by private owners who want to have total exclusive of their ownership. To preserve the privacy owners fence off the entire area owned and prohibit the local islanders from crossing the beachfronts to get to the sea. Often, the social and economic conditions of the community involved are neglected in the process of coastal development. Therefore, the objective of this study is to know the impacts of beachfront property barriers to the coastal habitat, livelihood and recreational activities of the community along the Samal coastline. Community along the coastline of Catagman was surveyed using two questionnaires, perceptive and quantitative. Based on hierarchical cluster analysis 5 groups of stakeholders were identified. It was found out that majority of the population in the study area belongs to group 3 which were mostly fishermen and others whose means of living depend on the sea. Therefore the needs of these group should be prioritized. A concept of ?Borderless Beachfront Development? was applied to cater the needs of the group. Six (6) adjacent beachfront lots of different owners were developed. They were taken as one big development but maintaining each others territory was taken into consideration. | |
658 |
_aArchitectural Design IX: Research Project in Architecture _cARCH191, _2BSA, College of Humanities and Social Sciences |
||
658 |
_aArchitectural Design X: Architectural Design Project _cARCH192, _2BSA, College of Humanities and Social Sciences |
||
905 | _aFi | ||
905 | _aUP | ||
942 |
_2lcc _cTHESIS |
||
999 |
_c2353 _d2353 |